<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Campaigning while female, 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.historiann.com/2010/10/16/campaigning-while-female-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.historiann.com/2010/10/16/campaigning-while-female-2010/</link>
	<description>History and sexual politics, 1492 to the present</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 00:04:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alexavier</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2010/10/16/campaigning-while-female-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-841684</link>
		<dc:creator>Alexavier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jun 2011 01:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=12820#comment-841684</guid>
		<description>And I was just wndeoirng about that too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I was just wndeoirng about that too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KC</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2010/10/16/campaigning-while-female-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-728511</link>
		<dc:creator>KC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 20:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=12820#comment-728511</guid>
		<description>Yeah, there&#039;s definitely major misogyny going on there, no doubt about it. From my perspective, nothing I&#039;ve seen from any candidate this election season has creeped me out as much as &quot;Carl&#039;s&quot; forwarded emails. 

Funny, my mother (children&#039;s book author) is writing a book about all the women who have run for president for a middle school audience. I was talking about it with her today and she told me about an interview she did with Shirley Chisholm years ago where Chisholm talked about how being a woman was much more electorally disadvantageous than being black. Almost forty years later, and it&#039;s not much, if at all, easier now than it was then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, there&#8217;s definitely major misogyny going on there, no doubt about it. From my perspective, nothing I&#8217;ve seen from any candidate this election season has creeped me out as much as &#8220;Carl&#8217;s&#8221; forwarded emails. </p>
<p>Funny, my mother (children&#8217;s book author) is writing a book about all the women who have run for president for a middle school audience. I was talking about it with her today and she told me about an interview she did with Shirley Chisholm years ago where Chisholm talked about how being a woman was much more electorally disadvantageous than being black. Almost forty years later, and it&#8217;s not much, if at all, easier now than it was then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Historiann</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2010/10/16/campaigning-while-female-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-728421</link>
		<dc:creator>Historiann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 16:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=12820#comment-728421</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/17/opinion/17dowd.html?_r=1&amp;ref=opinion&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Check this out&lt;/a&gt;, for example:



&lt;blockquote&gt;These women — Jan, Meg, Carly, Sharron, Linda, Michele, Queen Bee Sarah and sweet wannabe Christine — have co-opted and ratcheted up the disgust with the status quo that originally buoyed Barack Obama. Whether they’re mistreating the help or belittling the president’s manhood, making snide comments about a rival’s hair or ripping an opponent for spending money on a men’s fashion show, the Mean Girls have replaced Hope with Spite and Cool with Cold. They are the ideal nihilistic cheerleaders for an angry electorate. &lt;/blockquote&gt;


She&#039;s on a first-name basis, as a fellow Mean Girl, I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/10/17/opinion/17dowd.html?_r=1&#038;ref=opinion" rel="nofollow">Check this out</a>, for example:</p>
<blockquote><p>These women — Jan, Meg, Carly, Sharron, Linda, Michele, Queen Bee Sarah and sweet wannabe Christine — have co-opted and ratcheted up the disgust with the status quo that originally buoyed Barack Obama. Whether they’re mistreating the help or belittling the president’s manhood, making snide comments about a rival’s hair or ripping an opponent for spending money on a men’s fashion show, the Mean Girls have replaced Hope with Spite and Cool with Cold. They are the ideal nihilistic cheerleaders for an angry electorate. </p></blockquote>
<p>She&#8217;s on a first-name basis, as a fellow Mean Girl, I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Klein on elites and &#8220;ignoramuses&#8217; &#124; Katy Pundit</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2010/10/16/campaigning-while-female-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-728416</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Klein on elites and &#8220;ignoramuses&#8217; &#124; Katy Pundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 16:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=12820#comment-728416</guid>
		<description>[...] Campaigning &#119;&#104;&#105;&#108;&#101; female, 2010 : Historiann : History &#097;&#110;&#100; sex... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Campaigning &#119;&#104;&#105;&#108;&#101; female, 2010 : Historiann : History &#97;&#110;&#100; sex&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Historiann</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2010/10/16/campaigning-while-female-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-728385</link>
		<dc:creator>Historiann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 15:14:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=12820#comment-728385</guid>
		<description>I agree, Clio B.--we would have been out there with her in our 20s, too.  (And quite frankly, maybe even in my 40s!)

KC--it seems to me like the Palladino story is covered as a political news story.  I&#039;ve seen and heard reporting on his crazzy out here in Colorado.  The difference between the coverage of the male v. female tea party candidates is that it&#039;s only the women whose bios and words are held up for constant ridicule in opinion columns, on blogs, and on late night comedy shows.  The men are just as ridiculous--but I guess the men who write and perform in late night comedy shows are more titillated by imaginine O&#039;Donnell in her jammies than Palladino, Maes, or any of the middle-aged male tea partiers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, Clio B.&#8211;we would have been out there with her in our 20s, too.  (And quite frankly, maybe even in my 40s!)</p>
<p>KC&#8211;it seems to me like the Palladino story is covered as a political news story.  I&#8217;ve seen and heard reporting on his crazzy out here in Colorado.  The difference between the coverage of the male v. female tea party candidates is that it&#8217;s only the women whose bios and words are held up for constant ridicule in opinion columns, on blogs, and on late night comedy shows.  The men are just as ridiculous&#8211;but I guess the men who write and perform in late night comedy shows are more titillated by imaginine O&#8217;Donnell in her jammies than Palladino, Maes, or any of the middle-aged male tea partiers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clio Bluestocking</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2010/10/16/campaigning-while-female-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-728377</link>
		<dc:creator>Clio Bluestocking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 14:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=12820#comment-728377</guid>
		<description>The worst thing about that coverage (aside from the blatant imposition of gender-normativity, misogyny, slut-shaming, and so forth)? It makes me like O&#039;Donnell just a little bit. Front porch, p.j.s, cigars and wine? That&#039;s character!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The worst thing about that coverage (aside from the blatant imposition of gender-normativity, misogyny, slut-shaming, and so forth)? It makes me like O&#8217;Donnell just a little bit. Front porch, p.j.s, cigars and wine? That&#8217;s character!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KC</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2010/10/16/campaigning-while-female-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-728356</link>
		<dc:creator>KC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 13:23:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=12820#comment-728356</guid>
		<description>I dunno, up here in New York there&#039;s been plenty of attention paid to Paladino&#039;s insanity. 

What&#039;s weird about O&#039;Donnell is that, like Paladino, she has no chance of winning, yet people keep focusing on her anyway all around the country. 

Anyway, good post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dunno, up here in New York there&#8217;s been plenty of attention paid to Paladino&#8217;s insanity. </p>
<p>What&#8217;s weird about O&#8217;Donnell is that, like Paladino, she has no chance of winning, yet people keep focusing on her anyway all around the country. </p>
<p>Anyway, good post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Historiann</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2010/10/16/campaigning-while-female-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-727957</link>
		<dc:creator>Historiann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 19:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=12820#comment-727957</guid>
		<description>Flavia--Republicans (like O&#039;Donnell, Angle, and Palin) always poll better with men than women, the Democrats always poll better with women than with men.  So, they&#039;re largely the beneficiaries of the same male support that male Republicans get.  But who&#039;s to &quot;blame&quot; for tea-partiers?  Not the Nevada or Delaware Republicans, who backed more establishment (and more qualified) candidates.  

I agree with the author of the article you linked to, who writes that the success of dingbats demeans us all--but there have always been plenty of dingbat d00ds in American politics.  It&#039;s only the women who get called out for being dingbats.

and GayProf:  I think cookie symbology is so powerful precisely because they (cookies) are so useless.  They symbolize the application of feminine leisure time to preparing a nutritionally inessential food with mostly decorative value.  What better use of women&#039;s time, since they sure as heck shouldn&#039;t be in the workforce or paid for their labor?  That&#039;s how women should be judged.

When d00dz prepare and offer food to the press corps--as John McCain does, regularly inviting reporters to his house for a BBQ, and as Bush II did while President--it&#039;s always something substantial:  ribs, chicken, etc.  Protein-rich food that is worthy of a man&#039;s time and energy!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Flavia&#8211;Republicans (like O&#8217;Donnell, Angle, and Palin) always poll better with men than women, the Democrats always poll better with women than with men.  So, they&#8217;re largely the beneficiaries of the same male support that male Republicans get.  But who&#8217;s to &#8220;blame&#8221; for tea-partiers?  Not the Nevada or Delaware Republicans, who backed more establishment (and more qualified) candidates.  </p>
<p>I agree with the author of the article you linked to, who writes that the success of dingbats demeans us all&#8211;but there have always been plenty of dingbat d00ds in American politics.  It&#8217;s only the women who get called out for being dingbats.</p>
<p>and GayProf:  I think cookie symbology is so powerful precisely because they (cookies) are so useless.  They symbolize the application of feminine leisure time to preparing a nutritionally inessential food with mostly decorative value.  What better use of women&#8217;s time, since they sure as heck shouldn&#8217;t be in the workforce or paid for their labor?  That&#8217;s how women should be judged.</p>
<p>When d00dz prepare and offer food to the press corps&#8211;as John McCain does, regularly inviting reporters to his house for a BBQ, and as Bush II did while President&#8211;it&#8217;s always something substantial:  ribs, chicken, etc.  Protein-rich food that is worthy of a man&#8217;s time and energy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GayProf</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2010/10/16/campaigning-while-female-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-727945</link>
		<dc:creator>GayProf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 17:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=12820#comment-727945</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the deal with cookies as a measure of womanhood in politics?  This goes back to at least the Clinton/Bush era when Hilary dared to suggest that she might have more on her mind than crushed walnut pieces.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the deal with cookies as a measure of womanhood in politics?  This goes back to at least the Clinton/Bush era when Hilary dared to suggest that she might have more on her mind than crushed walnut pieces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LadyProf</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2010/10/16/campaigning-while-female-2010/comment-page-1/#comment-727939</link>
		<dc:creator>LadyProf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 17:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=12820#comment-727939</guid>
		<description>Klein is plenty wrong, Helm, if the #1 dangerous ignoramus he spots in American politics is a woman.  In his little essay he devotes 90% of his diatribe to O&#039;Donnell.  The next most dangerous ignoramus?  Sharron Angle.  Only later does Klein list Ron Johnson and Carl Paladino as part of the problem (but he doesn&#039;t actually say anything bad about them), and in classic bipartisan mode--because if he were a member of the knee-jerk liberal media that would be &lt;b&gt;wrong&lt;/b&gt;--he blows kisses at a bunch of d00dz with whom he does not agree, including Rob Portman, Rand Paul, and the Wall Street crook Steven Rattner.  

Joe Klein is not &quot;about 30 years too late&quot;; he&#039;s just plain sexist and misogynous.  And not alone among the pundits.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Klein is plenty wrong, Helm, if the #1 dangerous ignoramus he spots in American politics is a woman.  In his little essay he devotes 90% of his diatribe to O&#8217;Donnell.  The next most dangerous ignoramus?  Sharron Angle.  Only later does Klein list Ron Johnson and Carl Paladino as part of the problem (but he doesn&#8217;t actually say anything bad about them), and in classic bipartisan mode&#8211;because if he were a member of the knee-jerk liberal media that would be <b>wrong</b>&#8211;he blows kisses at a bunch of d00dz with whom he does not agree, including Rob Portman, Rand Paul, and the Wall Street crook Steven Rattner.  </p>
<p>Joe Klein is not &#8220;about 30 years too late&#8221;; he&#8217;s just plain sexist and misogynous.  And not alone among the pundits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
