<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: All the single ladies!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.historiann.com/2010/02/07/all-the-single-ladies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.historiann.com/2010/02/07/all-the-single-ladies/</link>
	<description>History and sexual politics, 1492 to the present</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 22:11:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Standards, stress, and sneetches: how can poor kids win? : Historiann : History and sexual politics, 1492 to the present</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2010/02/07/all-the-single-ladies/comment-page-2/#comment-766531</link>
		<dc:creator>Standards, stress, and sneetches: how can poor kids win? : Historiann : History and sexual politics, 1492 to the present</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jan 2011 17:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=9489#comment-766531</guid>
		<description>[...] of a rank striver from a struggling public school.  (Bonus:  this is surely a way to solve the gender gap in college&#8211;rewarding students for not working so hard and not achieving so much will surely favor the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of a rank striver from a struggling public school.  (Bonus:  this is surely a way to solve the gender gap in college&#8211;rewarding students for not working so hard and not achieving so much will surely favor the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Helen Huntingdon</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2010/02/07/all-the-single-ladies/comment-page-2/#comment-555179</link>
		<dc:creator>Helen Huntingdon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 12:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=9489#comment-555179</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;And meanwhile, some lonely shy geek who wouldn’t treat these young ladies like dirt is totally overlooked. &lt;/i&gt;

*snicker*  Clarence is repeating a common fantasy spread by some men who identify as &quot;lonely shy geek&quot;s, but the thing us, the men who do thus self-identify do in fact treat women like dirt.  Clarence even nicely outlined the logic of how they go about it -- women who are not doing what the Clarences want deserve to be treated like dirt, in his view.  So if a particular woman stops &quot;overlooking&quot; a particular Clarence and dates him, his not treating her like dirt only lasts as long as she continues to do what he decides she is supposed to.  Once she deviates from that, the treating like dirt starts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>And meanwhile, some lonely shy geek who wouldn’t treat these young ladies like dirt is totally overlooked. </i></p>
<p>*snicker*  Clarence is repeating a common fantasy spread by some men who identify as &#8220;lonely shy geek&#8221;s, but the thing us, the men who do thus self-identify do in fact treat women like dirt.  Clarence even nicely outlined the logic of how they go about it &#8212; women who are not doing what the Clarences want deserve to be treated like dirt, in his view.  So if a particular woman stops &#8220;overlooking&#8221; a particular Clarence and dates him, his not treating her like dirt only lasts as long as she continues to do what he decides she is supposed to.  Once she deviates from that, the treating like dirt starts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quixote</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2010/02/07/all-the-single-ladies/comment-page-2/#comment-554331</link>
		<dc:creator>quixote</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 04:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=9489#comment-554331</guid>
		<description>Fratguy: with a name like Fratguy I was prejudiced from the start . . . but by the end of the first sentence I was laughing out loud.  

Bullseye.

The second sentence was pretty funny too...although I&#039;m not at all sure about the &quot;unnecessary&quot; part.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fratguy: with a name like Fratguy I was prejudiced from the start . . . but by the end of the first sentence I was laughing out loud.  </p>
<p>Bullseye.</p>
<p>The second sentence was pretty funny too&#8230;although I&#8217;m not at all sure about the &#8220;unnecessary&#8221; part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thefrogprincess</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2010/02/07/all-the-single-ladies/comment-page-2/#comment-554002</link>
		<dc:creator>thefrogprincess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:05:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=9489#comment-554002</guid>
		<description>Even worse, he&#039;s sorry he thought he could use the n-word in an attempt to make some intellectual comments about &quot;being black&quot;. Predictably enough, though, the focus has been on his racist remarks, not on the latent misogyny and homophobia running through the whole thing. So he doesn&#039;t have to apologize for how he thinks about women.

Prof Susurro has two great posts about this at her blog, Like a Whisper.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even worse, he&#8217;s sorry he thought he could use the n-word in an attempt to make some intellectual comments about &#8220;being black&#8221;. Predictably enough, though, the focus has been on his racist remarks, not on the latent misogyny and homophobia running through the whole thing. So he doesn&#8217;t have to apologize for how he thinks about women.</p>
<p>Prof Susurro has two great posts about this at her blog, Like a Whisper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Historiann</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2010/02/07/all-the-single-ladies/comment-page-2/#comment-553995</link>
		<dc:creator>Historiann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 19:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=9489#comment-553995</guid>
		<description>Let me guess:  he&#039;s going to apologize &lt;i&gt;if he offended anyone&lt;/i&gt; with his comments.  Not for the comments themselves, of course.

Tools abound today!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me guess:  he&#8217;s going to apologize <i>if he offended anyone</i> with his comments.  Not for the comments themselves, of course.</p>
<p>Tools abound today!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thefrogprincess</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2010/02/07/all-the-single-ladies/comment-page-2/#comment-553994</link>
		<dc:creator>thefrogprincess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 19:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=9489#comment-553994</guid>
		<description>John S., if you want another crash course in the fragility of male egos, look no further than the John Mayer brouhaha that exploded yesterday. Yikes. I&#039;d tell you to read the entire interview but that&#039;s about 10 minutes spent wading through insecurity breeding deep misogyny, racism, and homophobia that you just won&#039;t get back. This bs is all around, friends. Tread carefully.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John S., if you want another crash course in the fragility of male egos, look no further than the John Mayer brouhaha that exploded yesterday. Yikes. I&#8217;d tell you to read the entire interview but that&#8217;s about 10 minutes spent wading through insecurity breeding deep misogyny, racism, and homophobia that you just won&#8217;t get back. This bs is all around, friends. Tread carefully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fratguy</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2010/02/07/all-the-single-ladies/comment-page-2/#comment-553985</link>
		<dc:creator>Fratguy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 19:32:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=9489#comment-553985</guid>
		<description>Clarence, the post was about the article discussing why undergraduate women have trouble getting laid, not why YOU have trouble getting laid, though those reasons should be apparent by now.  Yeah, I know, unnecessary roughness called on the defense, late hit after the play was called dead, 15 yard penalty and repeat the down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clarence, the post was about the article discussing why undergraduate women have trouble getting laid, not why YOU have trouble getting laid, though those reasons should be apparent by now.  Yeah, I know, unnecessary roughness called on the defense, late hit after the play was called dead, 15 yard penalty and repeat the down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John S.</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2010/02/07/all-the-single-ladies/comment-page-2/#comment-553967</link>
		<dc:creator>John S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=9489#comment-553967</guid>
		<description>Wow--I am naive. I check my blogroll in the early morning, go off to give a lecture, then return after getting coffee. Who knew that things could escalate from &quot;what about the doodz&quot; mansplaining to a rude commenter withdrawing his wisdom from this community while I explaining about the &quot;godless&quot; Constitution to my undergrads? I thought I was familiar with the fragility of male egos before, but I must say that this proceeded at a warp-speed I could not have imagined. Wow. I feel almost obliged to note that the person so concerned about the plight about the poor nice menz who get ignored by the ladies is also the one so quick to withdraw his company when commenters here &quot;attack&quot; his dissent. But that might be a cheap shot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow&#8211;I am naive. I check my blogroll in the early morning, go off to give a lecture, then return after getting coffee. Who knew that things could escalate from &#8220;what about the doodz&#8221; mansplaining to a rude commenter withdrawing his wisdom from this community while I explaining about the &#8220;godless&#8221; Constitution to my undergrads? I thought I was familiar with the fragility of male egos before, but I must say that this proceeded at a warp-speed I could not have imagined. Wow. I feel almost obliged to note that the person so concerned about the plight about the poor nice menz who get ignored by the ladies is also the one so quick to withdraw his company when commenters here &#8220;attack&#8221; his dissent. But that might be a cheap shot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Historiann</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2010/02/07/all-the-single-ladies/comment-page-2/#comment-553960</link>
		<dc:creator>Historiann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:22:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=9489#comment-553960</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re being too polite, CPP.  I think the only response to that is &quot;no $hit.&quot;  Oh, yeah--let&#039;s not forget &quot;tool alert!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re being too polite, CPP.  I think the only response to that is &#8220;no $hit.&#8221;  Oh, yeah&#8211;let&#8217;s not forget &#8220;tool alert!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comrade PhysioProf</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2010/02/07/all-the-single-ladies/comment-page-2/#comment-553954</link>
		<dc:creator>Comrade PhysioProf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:15:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=9489#comment-553954</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I must say however that when relatively modest dissent (if criticising a dating behaviour might be called a “dissent” against feminism.) is frowned upon or if any dissension from the approved male-bashing (those poor women! They just have to let the men they are attracted to abuse them due to patriarchy and stuff)is expressed it makes you feel you’ve been all mentally assaulted by misognynistic evil and all then this isn’t the blog for me.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I must say however that when relatively modest dissent (if criticising a dating behaviour might be called a “dissent” against feminism.) is frowned upon or if any dissension from the approved male-bashing (those poor women! They just have to let the men they are attracted to abuse them due to patriarchy and stuff)is expressed it makes you feel you’ve been all mentally assaulted by misognynistic evil and all then this isn’t the blog for me.</p></blockquote>
<p>AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

