<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tuesday round-up:  bossy broads beware edition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.historiann.com/2009/05/05/tuesday-round-up-bossy-broads-beware-edition/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.historiann.com/2009/05/05/tuesday-round-up-bossy-broads-beware-edition/</link>
	<description>History and sexual politics, 1492 to the present</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 04:11:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: pxcslfjppk</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2009/05/05/tuesday-round-up-bossy-broads-beware-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-822983</link>
		<dc:creator>pxcslfjppk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 May 2011 03:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=5098#comment-822983</guid>
		<description>wG6n89  &lt;a href=&quot;http://bxpalvlkdyhy.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bxpalvlkdyhy&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wG6n89  <a href="http://bxpalvlkdyhy.com/" rel="nofollow">bxpalvlkdyhy</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The History Enthusiast</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2009/05/05/tuesday-round-up-bossy-broads-beware-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-311314</link>
		<dc:creator>The History Enthusiast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 15:56:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=5098#comment-311314</guid>
		<description>Crazy--That situation was ridiculous!  How rude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crazy&#8211;That situation was ridiculous!  How rude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rad Readr</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2009/05/05/tuesday-round-up-bossy-broads-beware-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-310579</link>
		<dc:creator>Rad Readr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 04:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=5098#comment-310579</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t been watching the news but can&#039;t wait to hear people try to say Sotomayor. 

Hmm, that Rosen stuff sounds familiar. Women in positions of authority are &quot;domineering&quot; and &quot;bullies&quot; but the boys are leaders or some nonsense like that.  Back in my newspaper days I heard someone refer to a Latina editor as a &quot;b---&quot; (for doing her job). It gets ugly with the &quot;she&#039;s not that smart&quot; comment because this, in my experience, has racial connotations. I have heard it about colleagues at the u. -- a completely ridiculous comment in the larger context of society -- which implies that the person does not meet the standards of the good &#039;ol boys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t been watching the news but can&#8217;t wait to hear people try to say Sotomayor. </p>
<p>Hmm, that Rosen stuff sounds familiar. Women in positions of authority are &#8220;domineering&#8221; and &#8220;bullies&#8221; but the boys are leaders or some nonsense like that.  Back in my newspaper days I heard someone refer to a Latina editor as a &#8220;b&#8212;&#8221; (for doing her job). It gets ugly with the &#8220;she&#8217;s not that smart&#8221; comment because this, in my experience, has racial connotations. I have heard it about colleagues at the u. &#8212; a completely ridiculous comment in the larger context of society &#8212; which implies that the person does not meet the standards of the good &#8216;ol boys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Penny</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2009/05/05/tuesday-round-up-bossy-broads-beware-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-310578</link>
		<dc:creator>Penny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 04:09:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=5098#comment-310578</guid>
		<description>Lemme try that again:

Roberts had a seizure last summer, his second in 14 years; I think some of the early reports mentioned the possibility of a stroke, but that was apparently ruled out in subsequent tests:
      http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/07/31/supremecourt/main3117012.shtml</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lemme try that again:</p>
<p>Roberts had a seizure last summer, his second in 14 years; I think some of the early reports mentioned the possibility of a stroke, but that was apparently ruled out in subsequent tests:<br />
      <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/07/31/supremecourt/main3117012.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/07/31/supremecourt/main3117012.shtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Penny</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2009/05/05/tuesday-round-up-bossy-broads-beware-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-310573</link>
		<dc:creator>Penny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 03:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=5098#comment-310573</guid>
		<description>Erm, two seizures; I think some of the early reports mentioned the possibility of a stroke, but that was ruled out in subsequent tests:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/07/31/supremecourt/main3117012.shtml</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Erm, two seizures; I think some of the early reports mentioned the possibility of a stroke, but that was ruled out in subsequent tests:<br />
<a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/07/31/supremecourt/main3117012.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/07/31/supremecourt/main3117012.shtml</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Penny</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2009/05/05/tuesday-round-up-bossy-broads-beware-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-310572</link>
		<dc:creator>Penny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 03:46:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=5098#comment-310572</guid>
		<description>Just a nit to pick--Roberts had a seizure last summer, not a stroke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a nit to pick&#8211;Roberts had a seizure last summer, not a stroke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Professor Zero</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2009/05/05/tuesday-round-up-bossy-broads-beware-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-310392</link>
		<dc:creator>Professor Zero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 22:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=5098#comment-310392</guid>
		<description>I hold up my hand!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hold up my hand!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digger</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2009/05/05/tuesday-round-up-bossy-broads-beware-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-310370</link>
		<dc:creator>Digger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 22:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=5098#comment-310370</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t actually been told specifically to &quot;shut up&quot; in a professional context, but it has been made very VERY clear on occasion that my opinion is Not Welcome. Sometimes, that comes in the form of No Response Whatsoever, as though I didn&#039;t actually say anything at all.... sometimes, I&#039;m an angry, man-hating, breeder-hating feminazi lesbian... sometimes, it must be because I&#039;m PMSing.

Honestly, the one that makes me the most frustrated is the No Response Whatsoever. It&#039;s like yelling into the wind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t actually been told specifically to &#8220;shut up&#8221; in a professional context, but it has been made very VERY clear on occasion that my opinion is Not Welcome. Sometimes, that comes in the form of No Response Whatsoever, as though I didn&#8217;t actually say anything at all&#8230;. sometimes, I&#8217;m an angry, man-hating, breeder-hating feminazi lesbian&#8230; sometimes, it must be because I&#8217;m PMSing.</p>
<p>Honestly, the one that makes me the most frustrated is the No Response Whatsoever. It&#8217;s like yelling into the wind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Crazy</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2009/05/05/tuesday-round-up-bossy-broads-beware-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-310352</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Crazy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 22:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=5098#comment-310352</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s why having a women&#039;s caucus is still necessary for the International James Joyce Foundation, folks.  Totally :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s why having a women&#8217;s caucus is still necessary for the International James Joyce Foundation, folks.  Totally <img src='http://www.historiann.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Historiann</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2009/05/05/tuesday-round-up-bossy-broads-beware-edition/comment-page-1/#comment-310238</link>
		<dc:creator>Historiann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 20:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=5098#comment-310238</guid>
		<description>Yeah--the fat-shaming is the icing on the cake, ain&#039;t it?  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-05-04/fat-judges-need-not-apply/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Paul Campos has a great article up at The Daily Beast&lt;/a&gt; on how concern for their &quot;health&quot; and longevity only comes up in the evaluation of women in the federal judiciary.  Who was it who stroked out last summer?  The relatively fit and young John Roberts!

John S., thanks for the link to Greenwald--I&#039;ll have to check it out.  Erica has probably dealt with more a-holery than most of us in the humanities.  I mean, who would want to listen to an engineer about anything?  

Random thought:  engineers are like the opposite of economists.  The joke about economists is, &quot;we know it works in fact, but will it work in theory?&quot;  Ignore the warnings of engineers at your own peril!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah&#8211;the fat-shaming is the icing on the cake, ain&#8217;t it?  <a href="http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2009-05-04/fat-judges-need-not-apply/" rel="nofollow">Paul Campos has a great article up at The Daily Beast</a> on how concern for their &#8220;health&#8221; and longevity only comes up in the evaluation of women in the federal judiciary.  Who was it who stroked out last summer?  The relatively fit and young John Roberts!</p>
<p>John S., thanks for the link to Greenwald&#8211;I&#8217;ll have to check it out.  Erica has probably dealt with more a-holery than most of us in the humanities.  I mean, who would want to listen to an engineer about anything?  </p>
<p>Random thought:  engineers are like the opposite of economists.  The joke about economists is, &#8220;we know it works in fact, but will it work in theory?&#8221;  Ignore the warnings of engineers at your own peril!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

