<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gigantic Americans tower over shrunken British royal family!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.historiann.com/2009/04/04/gigantic-americans-tower-over-shrunken-british-royal-family/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.historiann.com/2009/04/04/gigantic-americans-tower-over-shrunken-british-royal-family/</link>
	<description>History and sexual politics, 1492 to the present</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 18:56:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: hysperia</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2009/04/04/gigantic-americans-tower-over-shrunken-british-royal-family/comment-page-1/#comment-282088</link>
		<dc:creator>hysperia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 04:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=4409#comment-282088</guid>
		<description>Well they&#039;re OLD.  That point has already been made, but, they&#039;re OLD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well they&#8217;re OLD.  That point has already been made, but, they&#8217;re OLD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2009/04/04/gigantic-americans-tower-over-shrunken-british-royal-family/comment-page-1/#comment-279823</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 03:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=4409#comment-279823</guid>
		<description>It can&#039;t just be camera angles, can it? But this is indeed a very funny picture!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It can&#8217;t just be camera angles, can it? But this is indeed a very funny picture!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Indyanna</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2009/04/04/gigantic-americans-tower-over-shrunken-british-royal-family/comment-page-1/#comment-279671</link>
		<dc:creator>Indyanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 00:28:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=4409#comment-279671</guid>
		<description>This was understood as far back as the Seven Years War.  Those maize-eating colonials shot up like rockets, while their metropolitan cousins shriveled away like grasshoppers.  George Washington in his &#039;40s could dominate a room, whereas his only slightly-older Revolutionary adversaries were already hunching over.  I think F.J. Turner said something about this...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This was understood as far back as the Seven Years War.  Those maize-eating colonials shot up like rockets, while their metropolitan cousins shriveled away like grasshoppers.  George Washington in his &#8217;40s could dominate a room, whereas his only slightly-older Revolutionary adversaries were already hunching over.  I think F.J. Turner said something about this&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erica</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2009/04/04/gigantic-americans-tower-over-shrunken-british-royal-family/comment-page-1/#comment-279657</link>
		<dc:creator>Erica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 23:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=4409#comment-279657</guid>
		<description>@Rose -- I laughed quite hard at that. Prince Phillip NEVER gets noticed.

@Mamie -- Even if he&#039;s standing far enough back from Pres. Obama that perspective is confusing Prince Phillip&#039;s height, he&#039;s standing almost right next to Mrs. Obama and looks shorter than her! I think he may actually be bending over slightly, sort of a &quot;am I supposed to be getting into this picture&quot; pose. One leg&#039;s further forward than the other, like he&#039;s walking/edging forward.

The Queen, however, is just short :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Rose &#8212; I laughed quite hard at that. Prince Phillip NEVER gets noticed.</p>
<p>@Mamie &#8212; Even if he&#8217;s standing far enough back from Pres. Obama that perspective is confusing Prince Phillip&#8217;s height, he&#8217;s standing almost right next to Mrs. Obama and looks shorter than her! I think he may actually be bending over slightly, sort of a &#8220;am I supposed to be getting into this picture&#8221; pose. One leg&#8217;s further forward than the other, like he&#8217;s walking/edging forward.</p>
<p>The Queen, however, is just short <img src='http://www.historiann.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mamie</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2009/04/04/gigantic-americans-tower-over-shrunken-british-royal-family/comment-page-1/#comment-279645</link>
		<dc:creator>Mamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 23:11:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=4409#comment-279645</guid>
		<description>Hmm.  According to their bios, Barack Obama is 6&#039;1.5&quot; and Prince Phillip is 6&#039;2&quot;. Is the camera playing tricks?  How far back is Phillip standing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm.  According to their bios, Barack Obama is 6&#8217;1.5&#8243; and Prince Phillip is 6&#8217;2&#8243;. Is the camera playing tricks?  How far back is Phillip standing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Historiann</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2009/04/04/gigantic-americans-tower-over-shrunken-british-royal-family/comment-page-1/#comment-279541</link>
		<dc:creator>Historiann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 19:46:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=4409#comment-279541</guid>
		<description>No nationalism, and I believe you about HM EII.  My point was more the contrast, plus Janice&#039;s point about time, the avenger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No nationalism, and I believe you about HM EII.  My point was more the contrast, plus Janice&#8217;s point about time, the avenger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digger</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2009/04/04/gigantic-americans-tower-over-shrunken-british-royal-family/comment-page-1/#comment-279539</link>
		<dc:creator>Digger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 19:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=4409#comment-279539</guid>
		<description>What GayProf said. Her Majesty is pure steel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What GayProf said. Her Majesty is pure steel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GayProf</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2009/04/04/gigantic-americans-tower-over-shrunken-british-royal-family/comment-page-1/#comment-279534</link>
		<dc:creator>GayProf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 19:31:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=4409#comment-279534</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t let the Queen&#039;s diminutive stature fool you -- She&#039;ll cut you if you get in her way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t let the Queen&#8217;s diminutive stature fool you &#8212; She&#8217;ll cut you if you get in her way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2009/04/04/gigantic-americans-tower-over-shrunken-british-royal-family/comment-page-1/#comment-279524</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 18:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=4409#comment-279524</guid>
		<description>I do hope I&#039;m not detecting some form of nationalistic jeering here! The Obamas are young, athletic, handsome and riding on a wave of popular adoration. The Windsors have a combined age of 1,563; get most of their exercise through waving (in the Queen&#039;s case) and finding Asian people to make ill-advised comments about (in Philip&#039;s case); are fairly striking for products of centuries of in-breeding; and are regarded with a mixture of disdain, bemusement and outright hatred by the British public. Gordon and Sarah Brown would match up to the Yanks a little better -- Gordon used to play rugby, after all!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do hope I&#8217;m not detecting some form of nationalistic jeering here! The Obamas are young, athletic, handsome and riding on a wave of popular adoration. The Windsors have a combined age of 1,563; get most of their exercise through waving (in the Queen&#8217;s case) and finding Asian people to make ill-advised comments about (in Philip&#8217;s case); are fairly striking for products of centuries of in-breeding; and are regarded with a mixture of disdain, bemusement and outright hatred by the British public. Gordon and Sarah Brown would match up to the Yanks a little better &#8212; Gordon used to play rugby, after all!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Janice</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2009/04/04/gigantic-americans-tower-over-shrunken-british-royal-family/comment-page-1/#comment-279522</link>
		<dc:creator>Janice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Apr 2009 18:38:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=4409#comment-279522</guid>
		<description>Though, in their day, Elizabeth and Philip were both the picture of fitness and verve, both accomplished equestrians and hardy outdoors-types. Time is merciless!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Though, in their day, Elizabeth and Philip were both the picture of fitness and verve, both accomplished equestrians and hardy outdoors-types. Time is merciless!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
