<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your thoughts, dear readers?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.historiann.com/2008/12/07/your-thoughts-dear-readers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.historiann.com/2008/12/07/your-thoughts-dear-readers/</link>
	<description>History and sexual politics, 1492 to the present</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 16:43:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dumbest. Comment. Ever. : Historiann : History and sexual politics, 1492 to the present</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2008/12/07/your-thoughts-dear-readers/comment-page-2/#comment-875653</link>
		<dc:creator>Dumbest. Comment. Ever. : Historiann : History and sexual politics, 1492 to the present</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=2236#comment-875653</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;m sure most of you humorless feminazis have been following with unsurprised disgust all of the chatter about Ron Susskind&#8217;s Confidence Men and his &#8220;revelation&#8221; that Barack Obama White House is run more like a pickup hoops game, with women advisors sidelined and shoved into the bleachers.  After all, President Obama made his basketball buddy the Secretary of Education, and those Obama golf outings sure look like photos of every other Presidential golf entourage of the past century, from William Howard Taft on.  Anyone who paid the slightest iota of attention to the gender politics of Obama&#8217;s 2008 campaign won&#8217;t be surprised, anyway&#8211;all of us &#8220;sweeties&#8221; over the age of 30 or so sure as hell paid attention. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;m sure most of you humorless feminazis have been following with unsurprised disgust all of the chatter about Ron Susskind&#8217;s Confidence Men and his &#8220;revelation&#8221; that Barack Obama White House is run more like a pickup hoops game, with women advisors sidelined and shoved into the bleachers.  After all, President Obama made his basketball buddy the Secretary of Education, and those Obama golf outings sure look like photos of every other Presidential golf entourage of the past century, from William Howard Taft on.  Anyone who paid the slightest iota of attention to the gender politics of Obama&#8217;s 2008 campaign won&#8217;t be surprised, anyway&#8211;all of us &#8220;sweeties&#8221; over the age of 30 or so sure as hell paid attention. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;Feminist Law Profs&#8221; in the WaPo this A.M. : Historiann : History and sexual politics, 1492 to the present</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2008/12/07/your-thoughts-dear-readers/comment-page-2/#comment-149008</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;Feminist Law Profs&#8221; in the WaPo this A.M. : Historiann : History and sexual politics, 1492 to the present</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Dec 2008 17:45:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=2236#comment-149008</guid>
		<description>[...] to our friend Ann Bartow at Feminist Law Profs this morning in a strange apologia on behalf of Jon Favreau: The blogosphere the past few days has begun to resemble Durham, N.C., circa 2006 following the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to our friend Ann Bartow at Feminist Law Profs this morning in a strange apologia on behalf of Jon Favreau: The blogosphere the past few days has begun to resemble Durham, N.C., circa 2006 following the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Satsuma</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2008/12/07/your-thoughts-dear-readers/comment-page-2/#comment-146613</link>
		<dc:creator>Satsuma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2008 01:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=2236#comment-146613</guid>
		<description>This photo was an outrage to all women.  An Obama staff member should be fired for doing something like this.  Any HR department at my company would take this very seriously indeed if it involved the photo of a woman in the office.

Folks, this is what sexism and the contempt for accomplished women looks like.  It&#039;s the same sort of thing frat boys do -- they hire strippers, they commit date rape, they harass women on the streets.

Imagine a card board cutout of Obama as a slave in chains. Good fun right?  When it&#039;s women, liberal men feel free to be as sexist and rape promoting as they want to be.  Just recently a man gropped my breast at an event.  I took him out in the hallway, and we had quite a talking to.  His terror was complete.  He might think twice about ever messing with women again!  

Fire that sexist pig immediately Mr. Obama, just clean house now!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This photo was an outrage to all women.  An Obama staff member should be fired for doing something like this.  Any HR department at my company would take this very seriously indeed if it involved the photo of a woman in the office.</p>
<p>Folks, this is what sexism and the contempt for accomplished women looks like.  It&#8217;s the same sort of thing frat boys do &#8212; they hire strippers, they commit date rape, they harass women on the streets.</p>
<p>Imagine a card board cutout of Obama as a slave in chains. Good fun right?  When it&#8217;s women, liberal men feel free to be as sexist and rape promoting as they want to be.  Just recently a man gropped my breast at an event.  I took him out in the hallway, and we had quite a talking to.  His terror was complete.  He might think twice about ever messing with women again!  </p>
<p>Fire that sexist pig immediately Mr. Obama, just clean house now!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heart</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2008/12/07/your-thoughts-dear-readers/comment-page-2/#comment-146288</link>
		<dc:creator>Heart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 20:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=2236#comment-146288</guid>
		<description>&lt;b&gt;Hysperia:  The ACTION of Favreau in the picture clearly says to me, as you have noted Historiann, “THIS is what women are for”. But I have a small bone to pick. I do take it as personal to Clinton - THIS is what women are for, not being President of the USA. And THAT matters to all women.

It may be that final issue that aggravates me past the point of how I would feel if this had been a cutout of anyone else. Whether it was consciously in Favreau’s head or not, the picture says, if you want to step out of your “place” women, you can expect this kind of treatment, because this is what we REALLY think about you. We will beat you (as in the Primary) and we will ave no respect for you before, during or after your run for office. So give it up.&lt;/b&gt;

YES.  You have absolutely NAILED one of the things that is SO egregious about this act, Hysperia.  It is male sexuality as dominance, i.e., &quot;this is what you&#039;re good for, and this is all you&#039;re good for, and the fact that our guy beat you proves it, so take THIS.&quot; 

The arguments about Facebook are to me not relevant.  If the guy had only e-mailed this photo to one person, it would still have been horrible.  The issue isn&#039;t the fact that Favreau got caught and all the reasons why he should have been more careful.  The issue is that the speechwriter for the President Elect thinks this kind of thing is funny in the first place.  He&#039;s a misogynist and should be fired posthaste.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><b>Hysperia:  The ACTION of Favreau in the picture clearly says to me, as you have noted Historiann, “THIS is what women are for”. But I have a small bone to pick. I do take it as personal to Clinton &#8211; THIS is what women are for, not being President of the USA. And THAT matters to all women.</p>
<p>It may be that final issue that aggravates me past the point of how I would feel if this had been a cutout of anyone else. Whether it was consciously in Favreau’s head or not, the picture says, if you want to step out of your “place” women, you can expect this kind of treatment, because this is what we REALLY think about you. We will beat you (as in the Primary) and we will ave no respect for you before, during or after your run for office. So give it up.</b></p>
<p>YES.  You have absolutely NAILED one of the things that is SO egregious about this act, Hysperia.  It is male sexuality as dominance, i.e., &#8220;this is what you&#8217;re good for, and this is all you&#8217;re good for, and the fact that our guy beat you proves it, so take THIS.&#8221; </p>
<p>The arguments about Facebook are to me not relevant.  If the guy had only e-mailed this photo to one person, it would still have been horrible.  The issue isn&#8217;t the fact that Favreau got caught and all the reasons why he should have been more careful.  The issue is that the speechwriter for the President Elect thinks this kind of thing is funny in the first place.  He&#8217;s a misogynist and should be fired posthaste.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emma</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2008/12/07/your-thoughts-dear-readers/comment-page-2/#comment-146280</link>
		<dc:creator>Emma</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 19:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=2236#comment-146280</guid>
		<description>There is one bottle in this picture.  One.  Which is assumed to be a beer, probably b/c it&#039;s a green bottle.  Favreua isn&#039;t drinking from it.  Isn&#039;t even holding it.

There is NO indication that this was a &quot;drinking party&quot;, that anybody was drunk, or that this was any kind of a party.  Indeed aside from the fact that there is one open (assumed) beer bottle, there&#039;s no evidence that anybody was drinking.

My understanding is that everybody in that photo has been identified as an Obama speechwriter.  It&#039;s equally as likely that they were all there working as that they were all there partying and drunk.

As to Bill Clinton:  his actions with Monica Lewinsky were 100% consensual on both sides, as Lewinsky herself has said.

As to the sexual harassment suit brought by Paula Jones:  Clinton was sued for his alleged behavior.  So, he at least had to face some consequences for what he allegedly did.  I say allegedly because the case was dismissed on the rationale that even if Clinton did what Jones said he did (which the Court made no finding on), it wasn&#039;t legally actionable as sexual harassment.  After an appeal was taken from the dismissal, Clinton settled with Jones without any acknowledgement or finding of liability or wrongdoing by Bill Clinton.  Whatever one might want to say about Clinton&#039;s alleged behavior, it cost him $850,000 plus more in attorney fees and litigation costs.

But Favreau should get a free pass because Bill 1) engaged in consensual sexual behavior with another adult and 2) got sued for sexual harassment and paid over a million dollars to settle it?  Really?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is one bottle in this picture.  One.  Which is assumed to be a beer, probably b/c it&#8217;s a green bottle.  Favreua isn&#8217;t drinking from it.  Isn&#8217;t even holding it.</p>
<p>There is NO indication that this was a &#8220;drinking party&#8221;, that anybody was drunk, or that this was any kind of a party.  Indeed aside from the fact that there is one open (assumed) beer bottle, there&#8217;s no evidence that anybody was drinking.</p>
<p>My understanding is that everybody in that photo has been identified as an Obama speechwriter.  It&#8217;s equally as likely that they were all there working as that they were all there partying and drunk.</p>
<p>As to Bill Clinton:  his actions with Monica Lewinsky were 100% consensual on both sides, as Lewinsky herself has said.</p>
<p>As to the sexual harassment suit brought by Paula Jones:  Clinton was sued for his alleged behavior.  So, he at least had to face some consequences for what he allegedly did.  I say allegedly because the case was dismissed on the rationale that even if Clinton did what Jones said he did (which the Court made no finding on), it wasn&#8217;t legally actionable as sexual harassment.  After an appeal was taken from the dismissal, Clinton settled with Jones without any acknowledgement or finding of liability or wrongdoing by Bill Clinton.  Whatever one might want to say about Clinton&#8217;s alleged behavior, it cost him $850,000 plus more in attorney fees and litigation costs.</p>
<p>But Favreau should get a free pass because Bill 1) engaged in consensual sexual behavior with another adult and 2) got sued for sexual harassment and paid over a million dollars to settle it?  Really?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2008/12/07/your-thoughts-dear-readers/comment-page-2/#comment-144760</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 00:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=2236#comment-144760</guid>
		<description>I really like the tone of the last dozen and a half posts.  They&#039;ve given me encouragement about participating in constructive dialogue on other threads in the future.  While our interpretations of what did or didn&#039;t happen, and what the significance is or isn&#039;t will continue to vary, I appreciate your thoughtful and lengthy responses to posts.  I&#039;ve been grappling with why this topic acquired so much energy over the past few days, and am happy to have what feels like a conclusion, and can again look forward to seeing some of you socially.

Historiann is right, after all...I really do not like Bill Clinton.

Geoff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like the tone of the last dozen and a half posts.  They&#8217;ve given me encouragement about participating in constructive dialogue on other threads in the future.  While our interpretations of what did or didn&#8217;t happen, and what the significance is or isn&#8217;t will continue to vary, I appreciate your thoughtful and lengthy responses to posts.  I&#8217;ve been grappling with why this topic acquired so much energy over the past few days, and am happy to have what feels like a conclusion, and can again look forward to seeing some of you socially.</p>
<p>Historiann is right, after all&#8230;I really do not like Bill Clinton.</p>
<p>Geoff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Historiann</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2008/12/07/your-thoughts-dear-readers/comment-page-2/#comment-144742</link>
		<dc:creator>Historiann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 23:58:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=2236#comment-144742</guid>
		<description>Thanks, everyone.  Welcome back steveeboy.  (What do you know about the AHA?  Are you a closet historian or something? ;))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, everyone.  Welcome back steveeboy.  (What do you know about the AHA?  Are you a closet historian or something? <img src='http://www.historiann.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hysperia</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2008/12/07/your-thoughts-dear-readers/comment-page-2/#comment-144674</link>
		<dc:creator>hysperia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 22:59:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=2236#comment-144674</guid>
		<description>Seconds on that one Erica!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seconds on that one Erica!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steveeboy</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2008/12/07/your-thoughts-dear-readers/comment-page-2/#comment-144671</link>
		<dc:creator>steveeboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 22:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=2236#comment-144671</guid>
		<description>kudos all, 

this is the best discussion of this topic I have found anywhere.

I feel like I just attended a very interesting and timely AHA panel or something.


Thank you for the education.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kudos all, </p>
<p>this is the best discussion of this topic I have found anywhere.</p>
<p>I feel like I just attended a very interesting and timely AHA panel or something.</p>
<p>Thank you for the education.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erica</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2008/12/07/your-thoughts-dear-readers/comment-page-2/#comment-144496</link>
		<dc:creator>Erica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Dec 2008 16:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=2236#comment-144496</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;the difference of opinion here is about the role that symbols play in our political discourse, and I don’t see any of us changing each other’s minds in this thread! That’s perfectly fine.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
I was thinking last night that this is one of the most civil disputes I&#039;ve managed to have online :) While I&#039;d like to &quot;win&quot;, I&#039;d rather have intelligent discussion. So thanks everybody.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>the difference of opinion here is about the role that symbols play in our political discourse, and I don’t see any of us changing each other’s minds in this thread! That’s perfectly fine.</p></blockquote>
<p>I was thinking last night that this is one of the most civil disputes I&#8217;ve managed to have online <img src='http://www.historiann.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  While I&#8217;d like to &#8220;win&#8221;, I&#8217;d rather have intelligent discussion. So thanks everybody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
