Comments on: The Ladies of Edenton meet the next lady of Foggy Bottom

By: “A lot of money would make things better.” : Historiann : History and sexual politics, 1492 to the present

Wed, 09 Mar 2011 17:01:49 +0000

[...] education” books that calls them for what they are: bull$hitte. (H/t to my colleague and occasional blog contributorNathan Citino for the link. He reads the New York Review of Books so I don’t have to!) [...]

By: Simpson Strikes Again « Sky Dancing

Simpson Strikes Again « Sky Dancing — Fri, 26 Nov 2010 23:20:47 +0000

[...] who during the primaries in 2008 characterized Hillary Clinton’s experiences as First Lady as drinking tea with foreign ambassadors. He’s the same guy who suggested that Hillary’s “claws come out” if you [...]

By: Of corpse-kicking and His Irrelevancy : Historiann : History and sexual politics, 1492 to the present

Thu, 04 Dec 2008 00:44:31 +0000

[...] over. Welcome to the Pantheon of failed presidencies, Your Irrelevancy! John Adams and James Buchanan sure are happy to see [...]

By: Historiann

Historiann — Thu, 27 Nov 2008 19:46:53 +0000

Prof. Z–I see what you mean, but I think she is a good representative for Obama’s foreign policy–actually she may have set a more progressive foreign policy as President than it looks like he will. His foreign policy is looking an awful lot like George H.W. Bush’s!

Your beef is therefore with Obama, not with Clinton alone, if he indeed has asked her to be his Sec’y State. (And, Happy Thanksgiving!)

By: Professor Zero

Professor Zero — Thu, 27 Nov 2008 18:37:35 +0000

But I am talking to this kind of comment:

“I think the appointment is a very good move by him, and for the country, and probably for her.” (Indyanna)

She and Albright have histories rather more tenebrous than tea, and less kind than visits to refugee camps.

By: Is Obama A New Kind of Politician? « mirabile dictu

Is Obama A New Kind of Politician? « mirabile dictu — Thu, 27 Nov 2008 00:38:43 +0000

[...] And Barack, if you want to sort out why your cute tea-drinking fantasy came to mind, check over here [...]

By: hysperia

hysperia — Tue, 25 Nov 2008 01:25:52 +0000

Last two comments – YAY! The history of political movements is so crucial for ongoing effectiveness – people love to focus on “what went wrong” but it’s equally, if not more, important to understand what went right, how, and what were the limitations. And yes, history in general. Which is why I love this post and the comments.

By: Historiann

Historiann — Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:37:03 +0000

That’s right–you’ve got it, votermom. If you can convince women that they have to reinvent the wheel of political activism, the process of keeping them disenfranchised is half complete!

By: votermom

votermom — Mon, 24 Nov 2008 17:35:02 +0000

It’s certainly a convenient way to keep women in line by letting them think that previous generations of women never made waves.

By: Historiann

Historiann — Mon, 24 Nov 2008 13:37:00 +0000

Hi votermom. It’s not your “ignorance”–you have to question why this remains an obscure event in the history of the Revolution. Why would generations of historians not have wanted to highlight it or talk about women’s activism in the Revolution? Why isn’t it presented as a women’s counterpoint to the masculine display of the violent destruction of the Boston Tea Party? Gee, I wonder! (Not.)