<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: If you didn&#8217;t like those t-shirts&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.historiann.com/2008/05/27/if-you-didnt-like-those-t-shirts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.historiann.com/2008/05/27/if-you-didnt-like-those-t-shirts/</link>
	<description>History and sexual politics, 1492 to the present</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 23:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Historiann</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2008/05/27/if-you-didnt-like-those-t-shirts/#comment-16400</link>
		<dc:creator>Historiann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 15:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=346#comment-16400</guid>
		<description>Roxie--do they make a dog-sized version?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roxie&#8211;do they make a dog-sized version?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roxie</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2008/05/27/if-you-didnt-like-those-t-shirts/#comment-16385</link>
		<dc:creator>Roxie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 14:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=346#comment-16385</guid>
		<description>I'm with you, Historiann -- I think the pantsuit has become iconic for Clinton in this campaign and that the tee-shirt is both clever and powerful in tapping into much of what it conveys about her candidacy:  her grace under pressure, the mix of elegance and practicality, her wash-and-wear ability to withstand sexist attacks.  I like it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m with you, Historiann &#8212; I think the pantsuit has become iconic for Clinton in this campaign and that the tee-shirt is both clever and powerful in tapping into much of what it conveys about her candidacy:  her grace under pressure, the mix of elegance and practicality, her wash-and-wear ability to withstand sexist attacks.  I like it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knitting Clio</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2008/05/27/if-you-didnt-like-those-t-shirts/#comment-16338</link>
		<dc:creator>Knitting Clio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 11:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=346#comment-16338</guid>
		<description>I voted for #3 also because I like Warhol and it was the most attractive, not saying much because overall the selection was kind of boring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I voted for #3 also because I like Warhol and it was the most attractive, not saying much because overall the selection was kind of boring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Indyanna</title>
		<link>http://www.historiann.com/2008/05/27/if-you-didnt-like-those-t-shirts/#comment-16120</link>
		<dc:creator>Indyanna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 01:28:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.historiann.com/?p=346#comment-16120</guid>
		<description>I voted for # 3, I guess it's a more traditional design, but colorful and summery. Is that the Warhol-inspired one?  Yes, the slogan is not too exciting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I voted for # 3, I guess it&#8217;s a more traditional design, but colorful and summery. Is that the Warhol-inspired one?  Yes, the slogan is not too exciting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
