Comments on: Who do you love? http://www.historiann.com/2008/02/16/who-do-you-love/ History and sexual politics, 1492 to the present Thu, 04 Dec 2008 21:18:12 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1 By: ortho stice http://www.historiann.com/2008/02/16/who-do-you-love/#comment-855 ortho stice Tue, 19 Feb 2008 15:20:18 +0000 http://www.historiann.com/2008/02/16/who-do-you-love/#comment-855 I finally figured out how to take the test. Clinton ranked the highest, then Obama, then Huckabee, and McCain was a long-way down. It's too bad for Clinton that I refuse to participate in acts that lend legitimacy to the corrupt federal government of an oppressive nation state. I finally figured out how to take the test. Clinton ranked the highest, then Obama, then Huckabee, and McCain was a long-way down.

It’s too bad for Clinton that I refuse to participate in acts that lend legitimacy to the corrupt federal government of an oppressive nation state.

]]> By: Historiann http://www.historiann.com/2008/02/16/who-do-you-love/#comment-828 Historiann Tue, 19 Feb 2008 02:18:59 +0000 http://www.historiann.com/2008/02/16/who-do-you-love/#comment-828 Rad--can I sign you up for remedial typing? (Don't you have some kids hanging around your house who can help you with teh video game?) Rad–can I sign you up for remedial typing? (Don’t you have some kids hanging around your house who can help you with teh video game?)

]]> By: Rad readr http://www.historiann.com/2008/02/16/who-do-you-love/#comment-825 Rad readr Tue, 19 Feb 2008 01:49:45 +0000 http://www.historiann.com/2008/02/16/who-do-you-love/#comment-825 I could not figure out how to take that test, so I closed the window before finishing. So much for the PhD I could not figure out how to take that test, so I closed the window before finishing. So much for the PhD

]]> By: David http://www.historiann.com/2008/02/16/who-do-you-love/#comment-726 David Sun, 17 Feb 2008 16:05:37 +0000 http://www.historiann.com/2008/02/16/who-do-you-love/#comment-726 I was a little surprised by my overly negative reaction to McCain, but now I think maybe it's because I view Huckabee as harmless and McCain, being the presumptive Republican nominee, as a threat. I was a little surprised by my overly negative reaction to McCain, but now I think maybe it’s because I view Huckabee as harmless and McCain, being the presumptive Republican nominee, as a threat.

]]> By: Historiann http://www.historiann.com/2008/02/16/who-do-you-love/#comment-699 Historiann Sun, 17 Feb 2008 04:31:18 +0000 http://www.historiann.com/2008/02/16/who-do-you-love/#comment-699 Huckabee must just have a likeable mug--it looks like he came out much farther up than any of us would have guessed in all of our attempts at the survey! Very interesting. He *is* a likeable seeming guy and a great campaigner--I just wish he was on our side! Huckabee must just have a likeable mug–it looks like he came out much farther up than any of us would have guessed in all of our attempts at the survey! Very interesting. He *is* a likeable seeming guy and a great campaigner–I just wish he was on our side!

]]> By: James Stripes http://www.historiann.com/2008/02/16/who-do-you-love/#comment-691 James Stripes Sun, 17 Feb 2008 02:30:53 +0000 http://www.historiann.com/2008/02/16/who-do-you-love/#comment-691 Huckabee appeared ahead of McCain (surprising), but both were way behind Obama (not surprising), and Clinton far below (where Huckabee should be found--a little surprising). Lots of typing errors from trying to move too fast cause me to distrust the results. As a confirmed Clinton hater, I find at interesting that media coverage of her over the past month has moved me towards possible acceptance of her as the next President. Ironic, given her somewhat hostile historic relationship with the media. I've seen Michelle Obama on the television more often than her husband, and haven't seem Bill at all. It seems almost as if it's Hillary vs. Michelle. Both came to Spokane, while Barack went to Seattle, so that may have skewed local coverage. Huckabee appeared ahead of McCain (surprising), but both were way behind Obama (not surprising), and Clinton far below (where Huckabee should be found–a little surprising). Lots of typing errors from trying to move too fast cause me to distrust the results.

As a confirmed Clinton hater, I find at interesting that media coverage of her over the past month has moved me towards possible acceptance of her as the next President. Ironic, given her somewhat hostile historic relationship with the media. I’ve seen Michelle Obama on the television more often than her husband, and haven’t seem Bill at all. It seems almost as if it’s Hillary vs. Michelle. Both came to Spokane, while Barack went to Seattle, so that may have skewed local coverage.

]]> By: David http://www.historiann.com/2008/02/16/who-do-you-love/#comment-686 David Sun, 17 Feb 2008 01:10:53 +0000 http://www.historiann.com/2008/02/16/who-do-you-love/#comment-686 For me, Obama was way at the top, then in the middle Huckabee was just ahead of Hillary, with McCain way at the bottom. For me, Obama was way at the top, then in the middle Huckabee was just ahead of Hillary, with McCain way at the bottom.

]]>